Resolving a contested delay on the evidence
Forensic schedule analysis and claims support that moved a stalled dispute on a treatment plant expansion to a fair, negotiated settlement.
Two parties, two accounts, one plant still to finish.
A wastewater treatment plant expansion finished well after its contract date. The contractor said the owner caused the delay; the utility pointed to contractor performance. Each side had schedules that appeared to support its case.
Public money and a working relationship were both at stake, and both sides needed an analysis they could rely on.
Representative engagement. Client identity withheld; specifics anonymised and illustrative.
How we changed the outcome
We let the contemporaneous record tell the story, period by period, with every step open to scrutiny.
The difference we made
The parties moved from fixed positions to a settlement grounded in evidence, without the cost of formal proceedings.
An approach both sides could follow, test and accept.
Responsibility assigned by evidence rather than assertion.
Settlement reached while the parties continued to work together.
The analysis was so clear that there was nothing left to argue about.Client perspective · name withheld for confidentiality
See your finish from here.
Tell us where your project stands today. In one conversation with a senior practitioner you will know where it is really heading, what is driving it, and what it will take to land it.
- Senior practitioner on the first call
- Confidential by default
- A straight answer, not a sales pitch